[LDES-technology] LDES presentation

[Kittner, Noah]

I interpreted it slightly differently with the chart saying that as energy density increases, the “cycle life requirement” or number of cycles will decrease – basically saying that if you can store more electricity you won’t have to cycle the storage option as many times during the course of its useful life. The cycle time might not necessarily lengthen. It looks like they are directly using the number of cycles in the useful life of the product as a key indicator for capital cost, which is why the they decrease across duration bins. Essentially they are talking about frequency of cycles rather than duration.

From: ldes-technology <ldes-technology-bounces at lists.ucmerced.edu>
Date: Friday, November 20, 2020 at 12:19 AM
To: ldes-technology at lists.ucmerced.edu <ldes-technology at lists.ucmerced.edu>, ldes-coremodel at lists.ucmerced.edu <ldes-coremodel at lists.ucmerced.edu>
Subject: [LDES-technology] LDES presentation
I’m curious whether you agree with the assertion on slide 10 (page 5) that the energy density must increase as the cycle times lengthen. If you are focused on flow batteries, this would definitely be true, but it might not hold for the geomechanical...
_______________________________________________
ldes-technology mailing list
ldes-technology at lists.ucmerced.edu
https://lists.ucmerced.edu/mailman/listinfo/ldes-technology
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucmerced.edu/pipermail/ldes-technology/attachments/20201120/b6f69a18/attachment.html>