<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">I interpreted it slightly differently with the chart saying that as energy density increases, the “cycle life requirement” or number of cycles will decrease – basically saying that if you can store more electricity you won’t have to cycle
the storage option as many times during the course of its useful life. The cycle time might not necessarily lengthen. It looks like they are directly using the number of cycles in the useful life of the product as a key indicator for capital cost, which is
why the they decrease across duration bins. Essentially they are talking about frequency of cycles rather than duration.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">ldes-technology <ldes-technology-bounces@lists.ucmerced.edu><br>
<b>Date: </b>Friday, November 20, 2020 at 12:19 AM<br>
<b>To: </b>ldes-technology@lists.ucmerced.edu <ldes-technology@lists.ucmerced.edu>, ldes-coremodel@lists.ucmerced.edu <ldes-coremodel@lists.ucmerced.edu><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[LDES-technology] LDES presentation<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I’m curious whether you agree with the assertion on slide 10 (page 5) that the energy density must increase as the cycle times lengthen. If you are focused on flow batteries, this would definitely be true, but
it might not hold for the geomechanical...<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br>
ldes-technology mailing list<br>
ldes-technology@lists.ucmerced.edu<br>
<a href="https://lists.ucmerced.edu/mailman/listinfo/ldes-technology">https://lists.ucmerced.edu/mailman/listinfo/ldes-technology</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>