[LDES-technology] Drafts for your review

[Sarah Kurtz]

At the meeting yesterday, we discussed giving feedback to E3 and to CEC on the scenarios and agreed that a short answer is better than a detailed answer.  Please give me feedback on the following:

***
We discussed how to best define complementary scenarios that will enable the CEC to learn the most from the two parallel projects.
• Modeling approaches are differentiating: We propose that the primary benefit will be for us to do independent analysis using a range of modeling approaches (We will use SWITCH, RESOLVE, and other tools that we are developing) and to compare how the outputs of those differ from those found by E3, providing the CEC with an understanding of the uncertainty of the modeling software/approach.
• It’s essential to include all inputs: We discussed our priorities, but it’s not clear that working through those with you will provide value. I think we all agree that the final answers will depend on ALL of the inputs, so for us to say that we won’t consider x or y would potentially compromise the accuracy of the results.
***

I hope the above is short and to the point, but your thoughts are definitely welcome.

Also, I am attaching the “Talking about Long-duration Storage” article. I have modified it to reflect Sergio’s good question - Thank you, Sergio!

Sarah

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ucmerced.edu/pipermail/ldes-technology/attachments/20210110/7a7c5fc9/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Talking about Long compressed.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 1561806 bytes
Desc: Talking about Long compressed.docx
URL: <http://lists.ucmerced.edu/pipermail/ldes-technology/attachments/20210110/7a7c5fc9/attachment-0001.docx>